7 ms·
I don't know details of this case but it's very unlikely GS was violating any FOSS license for just modifying code (assuming internal use only).
by atamyrat 13y ago
I don't know details of this case but it's very unlikely GS was violating any FOSS license for just modifying code (assuming internal use only).
- jessaustin 13y agoI think I see your point, but I wonder... do GS distribute code to their employees? To partner organizations? If so, what are the terms of that distribution? If they are anything other than the original license requires, that's a violation. Oh noes, now we can't have nice things anymore...
- ig1 13y agoI suggest you read the GPL faq which should help clear up some of the issues for you: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLRequireSourcePostedPublic http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLRequireSourcePos...