9 ms·

Two and a half years into my bachelor's, Sipser's Introduction to the Theory of Computation is the only computer science textbook I've had so far that I'd say I

Two and a half years into my bachelor's, Sipser's Introduction to the Theory of Computation is the only computer science textbook I've had so far that I'd say I really found useful for anything beyond the homework problems, besides K.N. King's C Programming: A Modern Approach. (To keep this on topic, my assembly instructor -- the legendary [to NC State students] Dana Lasher -- posts his course pack online. [1] It's a comprehensive introduction to computer architecture topics and original 8086 assembly programming.) [1] http://courses.ncsu.edu/csc236/lec/001/cops.htm http://courses.ncsu.edu/csc236/lec/001/cops.htm

NormaHHopson 13y ago
my friend's step-sister makes $84/hr on the computer. She has been laid off for nine months but last month her check was $21144 just working on the computer for a few hours. Continue Reading ===================================================http://www.Works23.Com http://www.Works23.Com
SusanLTomlin 13y ago
my neighbor's step-sister makes $67 hourly on the computer. She has been unemployed for nine months but last month her paycheck was $15744 just working on the computer for a few hours. try this site ====================================================== http://WWW.Works23.Com http://WWW.Works23.Com
justin66 13y ago
How does Sipser's content compare to Ullman's (free) Foundations of Computer Science? http://i.stanford.edu/~ullman/focs.html http://i.stanford.edu/~ullman/focs.html As far as x86 assembly goes, I found Kip Irvine's book to be pretty great. (not free) It's not a subject I would want to spend more time on, though.
- Fixnum 13y ago
  They're not similar at all. FoCS is mostly about introductory programming and data structures (with a tiny bit about automata). Sipser's book is about computation and complexity - it's comparable to Hopcroft and Ullman's Intro to automata theory, languages, and computation, for which Ullman recommends FoCS or equivalent as a prerequisite.
  - justin66 13y ago
    Interesting. Thanks. Coincidentally I just signed up for Ullman's Automata course at Coursera. The description makes it seem pretty basic but I'm interested to see what he does with it.

NormaHHopson 13y ago

my friend's step-sister makes $84/hr on the computer. She has been laid off for nine months but last month her check was $21144 just working on the computer for a few hours. Continue Reading ===================================================http://www.Works23.Com http://www.Works23.Com

SusanLTomlin 13y ago

my neighbor's step-sister makes $67 hourly on the computer. She has been unemployed for nine months but last month her paycheck was $15744 just working on the computer for a few hours. try this site ====================================================== http://WWW.Works23.Com http://WWW.Works23.Com

justin66 13y ago

How does Sipser's content compare to Ullman's (free) Foundations of Computer Science? http://i.stanford.edu/~ullman/focs.html http://i.stanford.edu/~ullman/focs.html As far as x86 assembly goes, I found Kip Irvine's book to be pretty great. (not free) It's not a subject I would want to spend more time on, though.

Fixnum 13y ago
They're not similar at all. FoCS is mostly about introductory programming and data structures (with a tiny bit about automata). Sipser's book is about computation and complexity - it's comparable to Hopcroft and Ullman's Intro to automata theory, languages, and computation, for which Ullman recommends FoCS or equivalent as a prerequisite.
- justin66 13y ago
  Interesting. Thanks. Coincidentally I just signed up for Ullman's Automata course at Coursera. The description makes it seem pretty basic but I'm interested to see what he does with it.