8 ms·
I opted to use TeamCity for all my CI exactly because of the UI. It's not perfect either, but I think it is vastly superior. Bigger install, though and relies o
by FreshCode 13y ago
I opted to use TeamCity for all my CI exactly because of the UI. It's not perfect either, but I think it is vastly superior. Bigger install, though and relies on a JVM.
- borplk 13y agois it free?
- falsedan 13y agoThe Professional license is free and gives 20 active build configurations & 3 simultaneous builds. I install extra instances if I need more.
- manojlds 13y agoYou might also want to look at Go[1] from ThoughtWorks* - the UI and first class Pipeline support is it +ves. [1] - http://www.thoughtworks.com/products/go-continuous-delivery/compare http://www.thoughtworks.com/products/go-continuous-delivery/... * - I work for ThoughtWorks, but not associated with the Go team, and use Teamcity and Jenkins more than Go.
- shaggyfrog 13y agoSuperior? Depends on what you're building. Using TeamCity to set up builds for iOS is a royal pain in the ass, and their OS X support in general is greatly lacking. I've had to create a whole ecosystem of shell scripts just to produce signed .ipa builds for QA -- which is kinda the point of purchasing a licence to a CI system to begin with.