6 ms·
So that means that no third-party services should be allowed? When I send an email to a company that uses third-party customer support software to consume, par
by scott_meade 13y ago
So that means that no third-party services should be allowed?
When I send an email to a company that uses third-party customer support software to consume, parse, and host the email; I don't agree to the TOS of the customer support vendor.
When I send an email to a company that uses third-party software to parse and archive email for legal purposes; I don't agree to the TOS of that email parsing and archiving company.
It would be ridiculous and impossible to expect that I would agree to the TOS of each and all pieces of software used in the processing of my communications with a company.
- gibwell 13y agoThose vendors aren't using the content of your email to further their own interests other than the expected function of delivering the mail reliably.
- Oletros 13y ago> Those vendors aren't using the content of your email to further their own interests other than the expected function of delivering the mail reliably. And? The intent is irrelevant
- gibwell 13y agoYou say this, but it's not actually true in law.
- scott_meade 13y agoI don't see anything about intent or reason for the "intercept" making a difference in the law http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2511 http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2511
- Oletros 13y ago> You say this, but it's not actually true in law Can you post a link to those laws