5 ms·
Why Ruby isn't slow
- fyolnish 13y agotldr: He's writing a ruby implementation in Python, that he claims is faster. But there are no benchmarks to back that up.
- pkroll 13y agoWell, RPython, which is not quite the same thing. And aside from the lack of benchmarks, http://docs.topazruby.com/en/latest/current-status/ http://docs.topazruby.com/en/latest/current-status/ says it's "extremely incomplete" which is generally where "fast Ruby" implementations exist.
- ksec 13y agoThe Benchmarks from Oracle on One VM to Rule it All has Topaz Numbers there. Basically MRI <JRuby <Topaz <New Oracle SVM, And the above line has roughly 20 - 50 times performance difference in benchmarks.