5 ms·

> Now you're just trolling. What the fuck does that even mean? > Given the response that occurred in the media and in general... The media is your measuring

by WayneDB 13y ago

> Now you're just trolling. What the fuck does that even mean? > Given the response that occurred in the media and in general... The media is your measuring stick? The same media that regularly objectifies women in your opinion? That's rich. You should probably go think about that some more. You and all the whiners just like you are the ones complaining about tit jokes, so you prove it.

SideburnsOfDoom 13y ago
> The same media that regularly objectifies women in your opinion? In my opinion? Citation needed. > You and all the whiners just like you Sweeping generalisation. So to be clear, you're saying that there's no fuss being made, and also it's being made by "whiners"?
- WayneDB 13y ago
  Does "the media" regularly objectify women or not in your opinion or not? Why not just tell me the truth instead of asking me to cite you on your own opinion? (I just can't imagine that you think "the media" is any better than this titstare app. Have you watched TV before?)
  - SideburnsOfDoom 13y ago
    Seeing as I never gave any opinion on the question of "Does "the media" regularly objectify women or not", it's irrelevant, despite you erroneously attributing that to me. It's a derailing tactic.
    - WayneDB 13y ago
      I responded to your assertion that: > Given the response that occurred in the media and in general... So no, it's not a derailing tactic. And if you didn't notice, this thread is three pages to the right. There's nothing to derail. When you're having a conversation in person, do you accuse them of being a Troll and derailing the conversation when they respond to your ridiculous assertions? Give me a fucking break. This is like arguing with a three year old. OK fine, you can have the last word if it's so important to you. I've already torn apart every single point you think you've made, so fuck off.
      - SideburnsOfDoom 13y ago
        If someone repeatedly said things in person like "Give me a fucking break" and "fuck off" and being generally disrespectful, while asserting that "I've already torn apart every single point you think you've made" and regularly misreading what's being said and failing to address the substantial point then yes, I would call them immature.
        WayneDB 13y ago
        Respect is earned, not given.
        SideburnsOfDoom 13y ago
        People on HN generally start off with a reasonable amount of respect from me - more so than Reddit or 4chan for instance. I've never seen anyone piss it away so rapidly before though.
        WayneDB 13y ago
        Who are you telling this to and why? Do you realize that nobody is ever going to see your comment? You're not too bright are you?
        chris_wot 13y ago
        Not to mention, there were a lot of arguments he made about not being concerned about being offended, then he got offended and started getting abusive. Ironic.

by WayneDB 13y ago

SideburnsOfDoom 13y ago

> The same media that regularly objectifies women in your opinion? In my opinion? Citation needed. > You and all the whiners just like you Sweeping generalisation. So to be clear, you're saying that there's no fuss being made, and also it's being made by "whiners"?

WayneDB 13y ago
Does "the media" regularly objectify women or not in your opinion or not? Why not just tell me the truth instead of asking me to cite you on your own opinion? (I just can't imagine that you think "the media" is any better than this titstare app. Have you watched TV before?)
- SideburnsOfDoom 13y ago
  Seeing as I never gave any opinion on the question of "Does "the media" regularly objectify women or not", it's irrelevant, despite you erroneously attributing that to me. It's a derailing tactic.
  - WayneDB 13y ago
    I responded to your assertion that: > Given the response that occurred in the media and in general... So no, it's not a derailing tactic. And if you didn't notice, this thread is three pages to the right. There's nothing to derail. When you're having a conversation in person, do you accuse them of being a Troll and derailing the conversation when they respond to your ridiculous assertions? Give me a fucking break. This is like arguing with a three year old. OK fine, you can have the last word if it's so important to you. I've already torn apart every single point you think you've made, so fuck off.
    - SideburnsOfDoom 13y ago
      If someone repeatedly said things in person like "Give me a fucking break" and "fuck off" and being generally disrespectful, while asserting that "I've already torn apart every single point you think you've made" and regularly misreading what's being said and failing to address the substantial point then yes, I would call them immature.
      - WayneDB 13y ago
        Respect is earned, not given.
        SideburnsOfDoom 13y ago
        People on HN generally start off with a reasonable amount of respect from me - more so than Reddit or 4chan for instance. I've never seen anyone piss it away so rapidly before though.
        WayneDB 13y ago
        Who are you telling this to and why? Do you realize that nobody is ever going to see your comment? You're not too bright are you?
        chris_wot 13y ago
        Not to mention, there were a lot of arguments he made about not being concerned about being offended, then he got offended and started getting abusive. Ironic.