8 ms·
Mmmm, while it sounds interesting, I am surprised at several things they have not implemented: 1 CDN or mirror service to lessen the load. There are free ones:
by mylorse 13y ago
Mmmm, while it sounds interesting, I am surprised at several things they have not implemented:
1 CDN or mirror service to lessen the load. There are free ones:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_delivery_network#Notable_content_delivery_service_providers https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_delivery_network#Notab...
2. P2P software for distributing content across a mesh network between the multiple servers (e.g. Gnunet & Freenet). Distributed Filesystems also work:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_distributed_file_systems https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_distributed_file...
3. Other communication than Jabber. Proper recommended secure channels are SILC, OTR, and now Beta secushare:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SILC_%28protocol%29 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SILC_%28protocol%29
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Off-the-record_messaging https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Off-the-record_messaging
http://secushare.org/ http://secushare.org/
The VPN is nice although. I wish STOMP was used more instead of PYSC. I still love IRC. It would also be awesome if they had a mini USENET, that would sell me over to volunteer.
- hank_dotnuts 13y agoFrom what I can tell, their problem isn't web related, a CDN or P2P software isn't going to do much when you are delivering mail. SILC and OTR? The former being a unmaintained nightmare, and the later something that is client related and not something they would "implement"?