6 ms·
Thanks for this. I have similar requirements (back-end already provided), which is why it was natural to choose Angular. But with the work done in Meteor 0.6.5
by matb33 13y ago
Thanks for this. I have similar requirements (back-end already provided), which is why it was natural to choose Angular. But with the work done in Meteor 0.6.5 and guides like yours, I would have chosen Meteor.
For those curious as to why I would choose Meteor over Angular: reason #1 is existing familiarity with Meteor, but a close #2 is that I would have to write much less code to accomplish the same things.
- ganarajpr 13y agoI would be very curious to know how the code would be "further" reduced when you move from angular to meteor. Could you elaborate on this point? Are you talking about meteor (backend+frontend ) or just meteor-frontend reducing the code size?
- matb33 13y agoI almost did an edit to my comment to say "less" instead of "much less". Generally speaking, Meteor is less verbose.