6 ms·
I think you quoted me and posted in the wrong place. What about a system that had no data retention but could actively scan and compare to a list of plates tha
by speedyrev 13y ago
I think you quoted me and posted in the wrong place.
What about a system that had no data retention but could actively scan and compare to a list of plates that had warrants, Amber Alerts or BOLO's. Surveillance is only going to get easier with tech. Rules of use is what is important.
- codyb 13y agoOh, I actually had not seen your post as it was a little farther down. Sometimes I don't make it all the way through ;-). I had responded to shivetya just to say what I believed. Your post seems exactly in line with what I was trying to say though in a lot of ways. Rules of use are exactly what are important and the fact is that most communities have not held votes to decide upon them despite the implementation of these scanners and the holding of the data. We need to decide as a people whether this is a national, state, or even county by county issue as well. It is public. You are on a public roadway. But what rights does that give to law enforcement to retain your driving records for an indefinite amount of time?