5 ms·

It's worth noting that the US has been tasking its diplomats to collect biometric (including DNA) samples of foreign leaders: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/u

by frebdel 13y ago

It's worth noting that the US has been tasking its diplomats to collect biometric (including DNA) samples of foreign leaders: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/us-embassy-cables-documents/202678 http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/us-embassy-cables-documents/... If massive databases containing DNA information could be as easily accessed as facebook user data, why would the NSA not 'collect it all'?

brown9-2 13y ago
How does a person's DNA help in fighting terrorism or any of the other things that the NSA does? It's not going to tell you who is exchanging information or plans like Facebook messages would.
- frebdel 13y ago
  It does not reveal intentions, I agree. So why do they want DNA? Ask the State Department. I'm not a geneticist, but if it was completely useless they would not be collecting it. My point is that the current infeasibility of collecting everyone's DNA could be the only reason they're not doing it. Edit: And ask the NSA or FBI if they'd like to have the DNA of every possible terrorist (and, incidentally, yours and mine).
- deleted 13y ago
  [deleted]
- CamperBob2 13y ago
  See, for example, the bogus "vaccination campaign" conducted in Pakistan by CIA operatives in an effort to locate family members of bin Laden and his known associates. For the government, the ends always justify the means. It's part of the fun of being totally unaccountable.