The article is something like "Illuminatus" or "Da Vinci" Code for Nazi-Fans. Many interesting and known facts without connection get woven together to support

The article is something like "Illuminatus" or "Da Vinci" Code for Nazi-Fans. Many interesting and known facts without connection get woven together to support a rather weak story. Even the author doesn't really believe it. The whole truth here is somehow like a sentence which i have read repeatedly in the last weeks on this board: Correlation is not causation. (I tried to write some arguments to support my conclusions. But i deleted them. It would have become too long. Go out, read some books on this topic. The facts are much more complicated and fascinating than this dumb conspiracy theory.)