6 ms·
I don't think that's accurate. Do you have a reference? http://www.zdnet.com/blog/stewart/adobes-q1-financials-show-developer-revenue-is-still-very-small/317 h
by nwilliams 13y ago
I don't think that's accurate. Do you have a reference?
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/stewart/adobes-q1-financials-show-developer-revenue-is-still-very-small/317 http://www.zdnet.com/blog/stewart/adobes-q1-financials-show-...
I would think ASP.NET/C# would make the most profits in the dynamic web language space.
- bdcravens 13y agoI guess I still think of C# as typed. My point being that CF has a license, whereas Ruby and Python do not - which has little value in gauging success, a la IIS v Apache/nginx. (Ignoring the reality of open source Railo and Open BlueDragon for the moment)
- nwilliams 13y agoSorry, I thought you meant dynamic in the context of the opposite of static HTML content and didn't realize you meant interpreted vs. compiled.
- tttp 13y agoNot to be pedantic, but I suppose you mean license as "you have to pay to use it". Both Apache and nginx have a (free software) licence.
- steveklabnik 13y agoRuby and Python are strongly typed, but they're also dynamically typed. Certainly not untyped. They also both have licenses, but they don't charge money to obtain a copy.
- bdcravens 13y agoYes, I meant "paid license" :-)