> But for me all this seems quite biased towards small Frameworks/Platforms. If one framework does less than another while still fulfilling the requirements of

> But for me all this seems quite biased towards small Frameworks/Platforms. If one framework does less than another while still fulfilling the requirements of the test, then it ought to outperform that other framework, right? I don't see that as a bias; it's the expected result. I said "does less" rather than "is smaller" there. I think that's an important distinction. It's theoretically possible for a framework to provide a feature at zero cost to users who don't use that feature (in responding to a given request). Some frameworks don't do that.