5 ms·
That choice seems more obviously between two evils than the climate change issue. :) I do acknowledge, as the other commenter suggested, that my view may be wa
by tc7 17y ago
That choice seems more obviously between two evils than the climate change issue. :)
I do acknowledge, as the other commenter suggested, that my view may be warped by being from the USA, where the battle is still about whether it exists at all.
- ilitirit 17y agoIt's not about climate change - it's an analogy. It's not a choice between two evils either (you could round them up AND kill them). And of course you could propose a multitude of different solutions beside or in addition to these. My point was that science cannot be used to justify all the choices you make in cases like these.