5 ms·
I hear this argument all the time, but let's get real. A million dollars in Berkeley isn't exactly a dump: http://www.ziprealty.com/property/6905-NORFOLK-RD-BER
by signifiers 13y ago
I hear this argument all the time, but let's get real. A million dollars in Berkeley isn't exactly a dump: http://www.ziprealty.com/property/6905-NORFOLK-RD-BERKELEY-CA-94705/3655873/detail http://www.ziprealty.com/property/6905-NORFOLK-RD-BERKELEY-C...
this isn't too shabby either:
http://www.ziprealty.com/property/42-MAIN-ST-SAN-QUENTIN-CA-94964/7039064/detail http://www.ziprealty.com/property/42-MAIN-ST-SAN-QUENTIN-CA-...
Now, I'll grant you, Palo Alto and San Mateo have a fair number of unexceptional ranch homes in this region, but it's bullshit to claim that you have to spend $1M to secure a minimally-decent family home in the Bay area.
Edit: Little bit of reality here (like $500K+ homes in San Mateo, and rentals in the $2,500-3,500/mo range):
http://www.zillow.com/homes/san-mateo,-ca_rb/ http://www.zillow.com/homes/san-mateo,-ca_rb/
http://www.zillow.com/homes/for_sale/Palo-Alto-CA/26374_rid/zesta_sort/37.495699,-121.970043,37.267632,-122.301006_rect/11_zm/2_p/1_fr/ http://www.zillow.com/homes/for_sale/Palo-Alto-CA/26374_rid/...
- sliverstorm 13y ago1) The article is talking about SF specifically, not Bay Area. 2) Of course you don't have to spend a million dollars to buy a place in SF if the median price is one million. Half the houses for sale obviously cost less than one million.
- davidjnelson 13y agoNot true. San Mateo, 3 bedroom, 2 bathroom, greater than 1,200 sq. feet house, greater than 2,000 sq. feet yard, built after 1980, not a foreclosure, sold in last 90 days, least expensive home... $900,000. http://www.zillow.com/homes/for_sale/San-Mateo-CA/fsba,fsbo,new_lt/house_type/13699_rid/3-_beds/2-_baths/90_days/1200-_size/2000-_lot/1980-_built/0_pnd/priced_sort/37.604372,-122.224874,37.500261,-122.405291_rect/12_zm/0_mmm/1_rs/ http://www.zillow.com/homes/for_sale/San-Mateo-CA/fsba,fsbo,...