26 ms·
It's just under the standard $500 authorisation limit for big corp credit cards. It also makes the $49 per year offer seem cheap.
by analog 13y ago
It's just under the standard $500 authorisation limit for big corp credit cards. It also makes the $49 per year offer seem cheap.
- jonknee 13y agoI doubt a corp card limit has anything to do with it, this isn't a business product.
- analog 13y agoBecause businesses don't need to store images? I've built an image library for a FTSE100 company. $499 per year for storage and access to a decent API would have looked pretty cheap to be honest.
- blowski 13y agoBecause Flickr TOS say you can't have a business account. http://www.flickr.com/help/forum/en-us/72157626812125880/ http://www.flickr.com/help/forum/en-us/72157626812125880/ I've seen nothing that says that's changed.
- analog 13y agoThat is a random comment in a forum from someone who doesn't represent Flickr. The actual TOS make no mention of whether you can have a business account or not. In face the best practices page specifically provides guidelines for businesses. "This guide is intended to help organizations—such as businesses, groups and non-profits—get the most out of Flickr." http://www.flickr.com/bestpractices/ http://www.flickr.com/bestpractices/
- Pyrodogg 13y agohttp://www.flickr.com/help/website/?search=sell+photos#3225708 http://www.flickr.com/help/website/?search=sell+photos#32257...
- analog 13y agoBusinesses do not need to be in the business of selling images in order to have a need to store images.
- Pyrodogg 13y agoTrue, It's just the first thing I think of when "photos" and "business" come up.
- blowski 13y agoI just feel safer using Dropbox or Glacier. Flickr seems more like a social network, specialising in photos, and I wouldn't feel comfortable about using a service like that as a backup. As a business, the TOS are just not clear enough about what I can and can't store.