10 ms·
This was my favorite test as well, back in the day.
by hdragomir 13y ago
This was my favorite test as well, back in the day.
- Achshar 13y agoWhy back in the day? It should still work just as effectively.
- Dylan16807 13y agoSure does. Did you know that you can still entirely lock up windows simply by having a bunch of programs access the hard drive too much at once? (And last time I made linux thrash it wasn't any better. Why is it so easy to keep the system responsive when a program or two hogs the CPU, but so hard when they hog disk I/O.)
- gizmo686 13y agoI haven't actually looked into this question, but I suspect the problem isn't so much that the system isn't responsive when I/O is hogged, but rather that individual programs are not responsive. On my computer, I occasionally get into a congested hard drive issue, and almost all programs I am running are incredibly non-responsive. However, my window manager (awesome), and virtual terminals stay snappy during this period. This is in contrast to when my CPU starts getting thrashed, when even those begin to get unusable.
- Dylan16807 13y agoIn my experience the core UI systems usually lock up. I can't use even the simplest already-active non-memory-allocating programs. And can you explain caps lock not responding for 8 seconds without 'total system lockup'?