6 ms·
Yes, there is more than one way to do it:-) Had I read the git ls-tree manpage more patiently, I should have wrote: git ls-tree HEAD -r --name-only
by baohaojun 13y ago
Yes, there is more than one way to do it:-) Had I read the git ls-tree manpage more patiently, I should have wrote:
git ls-tree HEAD -r --name-only