19 ms·
> For context, I'm a developer evangelist. Actually, no, you are not. You are - by definition - a terrorist, applying unlawful use of force or violence agains
by TY812 14y ago
> For context, I'm a developer evangelist.
Actually, no, you are not. You are - by definition - a terrorist, applying unlawful use of force or violence against people with the intention of intimidating or coercing groups of people and societies for ideological or political reasons.
The fact that you do have supporters shows the sad state of affairs this world is in.
- andybak 14y agoMy, how flexible the word 'terrorist' has become.
- ffuck 14y agohow flexible the word "evangelist" has become
- KuraFire 14y agoWow, you give tech a bad name both by your massively offensive accusation, as well as your completely wrong use of the word "terrorist" thereby reducing its significance. The thing showing a sad state of affairs here is you.
- colinbm 14y agoConsidering how completely wrong use/interpretation of the words sexism/sexist, thereby reducing their significance, is what this is all about, it seems apt.
- TY812 14y agoI am following the definition given by many dictionaries (and, by the way, 28 Code of Federal Regulations Section 0.85). Terrorists don't all wear beards and have TNT strapped around their waists while piloting hijacked planes, you know?
- onceuponapriori 14y agoI think what she did was awful. But I have a hard time understanding how you cant see that her actions don't meet all of the conditions found in the definition you yourself supplied.