Maybe I should have linked to the internal legacy version of the code (https://github.com/HubSpot/asset_bender/tree/master https://github.com/HubSpot/asset_bend

Maybe I should have linked to the internal legacy version of the code (https://github.com/HubSpot/asset_bender/tree/master https://github.com/HubSpot/asset_bender/tree/master) instead of the new in-progress v2 (https://github.com/HubSpot/asset_bender/tree/future https://github.com/HubSpot/asset_bender/tree/future)? The point is that we'd rather gather feedback and hear from the community before we assume that everything we've done internally is exactly what other people and companies need. And sure, it would be awesome if we had a super polished version ready for anyone to use, but we kind of want to gauge interest before plowing ahead on v2 in isolation. ps: About the forks, I'd love to get them merged upstream, but I have the feeling that they diverge more than the owners would like. But yes, we need to have that conversation (and suggestions are welcome, I'm pretty new to the ruby community).