7 ms·
He went to gawker first then to at & t he hasn't got a leg to stand on , he tried to profit front he flaw before reporting it..
by debian69 14y ago
He went to gawker first then to at & t he hasn't got a leg to stand on , he tried to profit front he flaw before reporting it..
- lawnchair_larry 14y agoGoing to Gawker first is not a crime. Not even going to AT&T at all is not a crime. If people on hacker news are seriously this confused, it's no wonder there is no hope for a legitimate jury in CFAA cases.
- smsm42 14y agoIf you want to get technical, accessing the records in the first place is the crime. All the rest is just demonstrating the intent and the public interest in prosecuting him.