18 ms·
It isn't fully functional, is it? The image from the CI opens with an STDOUT error. What's missing to have a "nice" (working?) configuration for Pharo 2.0?
by emaringolo 14y ago
It isn't fully functional, is it? The image from the CI opens with an STDOUT error.
What's missing to have a "nice" (working?) configuration for Pharo 2.0?
- dh83 14y agoSeaside works, yet it has not been officially release for 2.0 hence we rely on a gofer script to load all dependencies. What error? I doubt it's related to seaside. And for the configuration we mostly need somebody to do it :) since the seaside config is pretty big on its own you got to be careful when changing things for a new release.