6 ms·
They can't, because the people who own the robots also own a robotic police force. Two years ago when Mubarak told the Egyptian army to spray protestors with b
by yairchu 14y ago
They can't, because the people who own the robots also own a robotic police force.
Two years ago when Mubarak told the Egyptian army to spray protestors with bullets, and the soldiers refused. That's because he didn't have a robotic force. The future is probably going to be horrible.
- AnthonyMouse 14y agoYou think a robotic police force is going to help a dictator? Maybe for a couple of days, until someone with a conscience and a brain realizes that Robocop is running a vulnerable version of Java and suddenly "your" robotic police force is my robotic police force.
- pbhjpbhj 14y agoThere's no reason though that the person who pays for the vulnerability to be exploited, or performs the exploit, can't be a [malevolent] dictator though.
- AnthonyMouse 14y agoExcept that most people are good, especially among hackers. If this wasn't the case the world would already have exploded -- you don't think those drones they fly around with missiles attached to them have exactly zero vulnerabilities, do you? The most dangerous thing for the future is the opaque systems and "dangerous information" prohibitions that deprive the public of the knowledge necessary to fight the bad guys. Reminds me of this: http://xkcd.com/504/ http://xkcd.com/504/