5 ms·
path was designed to be a deeply personal social experience. if you take the time to recruit 8 people it will be a great experience for you. i usually recommend
by davemorin 14y ago
path was designed to be a deeply personal social experience. if you take the time to recruit 8 people it will be a great experience for you. i usually recommend that people start with their family first, as the core use case we tend to serve is families wanting to stay closer.
- fakeer 14y agodave, I tried :-) Honestly it doesn't work. It's not sth that's filling a gap. They have Twitter/Facebook/IG (very few are still into Orkut :P) blah-blah. So, they just won't use it. It's not everyone who hates those farmville updates, spam links etc (like me or many others). Most are just fine with it. AAMOF most of my friends enthusiastically re-share those bs videos(some are not even videos). Taste for a minimal and clean experience is sth very scarce. All this happens on desktop, in a browser. Not in the mobile app. Mobile app just a link for them(and for me too) to look at sth new and very interesting(if there at all) and then use the app extensively on the desktop. Actually I am not very positively hopeful about apps like WhatsApp either. It's not uniform. Hell, I would rather chat with GTalk everywhere - both desktop and phone, rather than WhatsApp on phone and then Gtalk on desktop. I love the idea of keeping messaging/chat separated from mail but it needs to come everywhere. Only apps I successfully converted many in my circle with are Dropbox, Astrid/Any.do, Evernote(maximum)/SimpleNote(because of the very good Windows app Resoph), WhatsApp, Pocket etc - because they filled a gap more or less.
- davemorin 14y agothat's cool. we'll keep going and hope to win you as a user at some point :) appreciate your feedback.
- mchusma 14y agoDave. My immediate family, wife, and grandma use path for basically our entire communications. We love it, brought us closer together. One product note. I like path because it is only my immediate family, so the suggesting friends thing is a little annoying (because I think it will be less valuable to me of I add more people).
- davidkatz 14y agoI tried that use case several times, I really dig the vision. It never sticks for me though, I don't get enough value added. Especially for my parents, Path is too complex, and a family whatsapp group serves much of the same function. I'll keep trying Path once every few months, maybe one day it will stick.
- revorad 14y agoDave, I really want to use Path, but my closest friends and family either don't have an Android or iOS device, or can't be bothered to join a new social network. You know what we use instead? Whatsapp. If it were pitched to us as a social network, we'd have passed but free international messaging (at a time no other app did)? Sign us all up!. It's fast, it's simple, it's our private social network. Maybe with Path's addition of messaging, things will change. But if you could bring your app to Blackberry, that would be a huge help.
- soneca 14y agoDave, do you have any tactics to help people recruit 8 more people? Or recruit the family? This sound like the most important issue raised here and still something that only depends on word of mouth. Actually is "let's encourage new users to recruit 8 more people, preferentially among their family" part of the grownth strategy?
- elisehein 14y agoI went for "please sign up on Path and add me as a friend because unlike on Facebook, there are some things that I share which I really sincerely would like YOU (and not every other random person) to see". I've got my family and closest friends on Path now, about 12 people in total, most of whom add content regularly and I'm happy :) Having said that, as much as I like Path, I do sometimes feel like I'm doing them a favour promoting it so aggressively, and the favour hasn't quite been returned yet.