6 ms·
Sure, but once the text is cached in a layer that layer might be rotated or scaled or similar, in which case subpixel antialiased text would cause ugly artifact
by capisce 14y ago
Sure, but once the text is cached in a layer that layer might be rotated or scaled or similar, in which case subpixel antialiased text would cause ugly artifacts. Keeping subpixel antialiased text in the layer and re-rendering the layer without subpixel antialiasing when a rotating or scaling animation starts would lead to stutters in the animation.
Looking forward to high DPI displays obsoleting subpixel antialiasing as it leads to a bunch of problems when wanting to create fluidly animating UIs.
- ferongr 14y agoI don't know what Firefox does on GNU/Linux or OSX but on Windows 7 with DirectWrite, applying transformations to subpixel-AA'ed text is very fast and has excellent fidelity.
- aoetr 14y agoYeah, but in the example the text is not transformed, it's merely overlaid on a composited surface.