4 ms·

I've created dozens of sites and never really noticed any CSS performance issues. I have got orders of magnitude faster sites by combining CSS or js files, gzi

I've created dozens of sites and never really noticed any CSS performance issues. I have got orders of magnitude faster sites by combining CSS or js files, gzipping content, adding cache control headers, serving via a cdn and not serving code that's not used. I've also really benefitted from using logical markup and CSS selectors, not those designed for "efficiency" of the computer rendering them.

Schlaefer 14y ago
If you are done with the obvious optimizations, at some point you spend half a day to gain 50 ms on the backend. And that's a good day. If you are able to achieve 25 ms on the frontend in half an hour, it's worth considering. E.g. Font Awesome [1] is very popular, but the selector performance is horrible. [1] http://fortawesome.github.com/Font-Awesome/ http://fortawesome.github.com/Font-Awesome/