8 ms·
"What's being debated is who should be recognized as married for official purposes" It shouldn't make a difference whether or not someone is married... you kno
by ryanaghdam 14y ago
"What's being debated is who should be recognized as married for official purposes"
It shouldn't make a difference whether or not someone is married... you know, equal protection under the law. The solution to things like survivor benefits and the others you mentioned (and you're right, Amash doesn't mention this solution) is to simply have private contracts that people decide upon themselves.
"If he opposed DOMA, and instead introduced legislation to abolish all government recognition of marriage, I'd give him kudos for that!"
Agreed.
- drivebyacct2 14y agoSeriously, find a single Tea Party candidate that ACTUALLY has that view on marriage. That IS the view I have on marriage, it is the libertarian view, and there isn't a single Tea Party candidate that supports that view.
- illuminate 14y agoThe problem generally is that there's more to Libertarianism than fiscal conservatism, and Tea Party interests tend to be just as selectively fiscally conservative as the battered-brand mainstream Republicans once they're placed in power. It' s a gimmick for Republicans who don't want to be called Republicans but be elected by socially conservative Republicans that call themselves Libertarian :p
- drivebyacct2 14y agoI couldn't agree more with that assessment.
- ryanaghdam 14y agoAgreed -- economic and social freedom should go hand-in-hand.