5 ms·
libavl. Next?
by portLAN 19y ago
libavl. Next?
- thomasptacek 19y agoEww. Better to use C++ than AVL trees.
- portLAN 19y agohttp://www.stanford.edu/~blp/avl/ http://www.stanford.edu/~blp/avl/ * Binary search trees * AVL trees * Red-black trees
- thomasptacek 19y agoOh. This is a library under straight GPL. You can't use it in non-GPL code. No wonder I hadn't heard of it before. Thanks for the pointer, it's neat. I really like how my approach turned out; the STLport red-black tree is well done. Backporting it to C only took a couple hours.