12 ms·

Meetup, you've been bad, bad hosts

146 points by yoavfr 14y ago

jQueryIsAwesome 14y ago
Just like everything in this world someone point out his bad experience and then his opinion become famous and everyone generalizes because it gets a lot of attention. And worst, the comment section attracts all the people that had a similar experience making it even more biased; so it gets a lot of more bad press than it deserves. So despite there could being just one false-positive-not-fixed-after-human-contact every 1 million deleted meetups, in Internet that false-positive is likely to bring a lot of undeserved negative attention.
- talkingquickly 14y ago
  I definitely agree that one in a million failures do tend to generate an unreasonable amount of negative press, I guess because they're easy to relate to on a personal level. In this case however I think a valid point is being highlighted. False positives do happen but it's concerning that Meetup doesn't seem to have any way of rectifying them e.g. they deleted an event rather than disabling it. Personally a big fan of Meetup but if this story is accurate and in the event of a false positive, there really is no way of rectifying it, I'd be concerned about using them to organise an event.
Maxious 14y ago
See also "Meetup.com kills Vim London without warning" http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4698541 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4698541 particularly http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4698718 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4698718 > This was a mistake on our part. We're reaching out and rectifying things now. Sorry guys. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, hello Eventbrite!
- MichaelGG 14y ago
  Not saying that Meetup is great, and Eventbrite might be vastly better. But a simple 2-strike rule is worthless. You need to look at the actual error rate (in this case, essentially a spam false positive) to determine if Meetup is truly a poor service. Otherwise, any smaller service will look better because they will have less complaints in absolute terms.
  - adamkiss 14y ago
    > But a simple 2-strike rule is worthless. If paid service unrestorably deletes data without first getting in touch with client, it is worthless, as you should have moved away first time it happened.
    - freshhawk 14y ago
      So far both cases were for events promoting a specific product. They were in the grey area for sure (this one less so) but they were both in the same grey area. So yes, now I will definitely not use them for anything related to me trying to sell something, but I wouldn't have anyway, and continue using them for actual meetups based on common interests.
      - adamkiss 14y ago
        I am not questioning whether OP did something wrong; If he did, as a paying customer (and first offender), I would anticipate some kind of notification email, or something at least. Sure, for repeat offenders: repeat notifications, then close account, refund adequate part of payment and that's it. You should never irreversibly delete someone's data. Moreover when he's paying you.
  - danshapiro 14y ago
    If Meetup's error rate was public information, your point would be sound. Since it is not, it is reasonable for the author to look at his experience only. Giving them two chances and experiencing a 100% failure rate seems like reasonable cause to abandon them.
- jasonlotito 14y ago
  The Vim Meetup was rightfully shutdown. It was the first meetup, and that meeting was intended to promote a product. In the end, the meeting and it's intended purpose was against the ToS. Moreso, it amounted to using Meetup as a way to spam people about said product.
djb_hackernews 14y ago
That is a pretty dramatic response to Meetup deleting a group. I've never created a group, but it seems the event WAS outside of the intended use of Meetup. It looks like poster was trying to use it to host a single event where Meetup wants you to create groups that meet and communicate regularly. To me, it looks like the poster was indeed using Meetup as a listing service. I think the telling piece of information that was left out is what the questions Meetup suggested asking yourself before creating a group. But yea, this isn't as near big a deal as the poster is making it out to be.
- whichdan 14y ago
  It's still surprising that the data was deleted instead of internally flagged.
  - PommeDeTerre 14y ago
    How do you know that the data have actually been deleted? The excerpt from the (apparently edited) Meetup response merely says, "Once a Meetup Group has been removed from the site, it's final." That doesn't say anything at all about the state of the data. It may just be that they don't want to have to deal with appeals when groups are removed, so their policy is to make all removals final, even if the data are left untouched.
    - whichdan 14y ago
      That's a good point; on Meetup's scale, they probably deal with a large amount of similar disputes. It's still a shame that they don't make exceptions for cases like this.
    - talkingquickly 14y ago
      That makes a lot of sense, I hadn't considered that it might be a decision based on the high support costs of ever entering into negotiations rather than a technical limitation or process issue.
- lnanek2 14y ago
PanMan 14y ago
Meetup is quite a bad service, but I don't know any better alternatives. I was one of the organizers of one of the larger meetups, with over 4K members. Some issues: * The tools are nowhere near adequate to handle this amount of people, and more geared towards small groups * However, there is NO way to switch: Your data is locked in with Meetup: There is no export or even access to the data of 'your' members. * You can't just cancel a group: If you stop paying (which I did with a smaller group), it's offered to all members. All it takes is 1 spammer to pay, to spam all members. Basically, we are forced to keep paying for our group for years. There is a big opportunity to build a better service here, but switching from meetup will be a pain.
- SeanDav 14y ago
  From the sounds of it - just change your group description to something not descriptive enough and hey, presto, one perma-deleted group.
  - PanMan 14y ago
    We still have >4K members, and still have to keep paying to keep them from getting spammed.
    - ajays 14y ago
      Spam them yourself, telling them to leave the group; tell them what will happen when you stop paying; and if someone still sticks around, they can face the consequences.
- polynomial 14y ago
  It was abundantly clear from the time Heiferman founded meetup 10 years ago they were pursuing a gatekeeper model with a lock in strategy. When that struggled to take off they had to relax the gatekeeping a bit, but they're never really changed their spots. Another example of a widely used service where users trade off a list of hidden & future downsides for a little immediate convenience.
iuguy 14y ago
When you run your business (or in this case event) on someone else's network/app/system you're subject to the whims of the owner. You're sharecropping. FWIW 44Con[1] used Eventbrite[2] (which I'd say is better for one-off events) for the first two years. Eventbrite check-in is awesome, but it's not perfect. This year we're switching to a system we've developed internally and using Eventbrite only for check-in. It's not that Eventbrite isn't good enough, more to do with integration issues, multiple events with different needs and the fees involved to do it all in eventbrite. I'd still recommend eventbrite for someone wanting to run a one-off event though. [1] - http://44con.com http://44con.com [2] - http://www.eventbrite.com http://www.eventbrite.com
j2labs 14y ago
I run three meetups and know a bunch of the folks that work there. They are extremely fair minded people. Fairer than I am myself. Given what I know of the people, the service, and my experience hosting three meetups, this story doesn't feel right. Meetup has done a lot to bolster the tech community in NYC. I have met almost all of my tech friends in NYC via meetups. Meetup employees even come to some of my meetups. I know for a fact that they care about creating positive environments where attendees are not bombarded by commercial interests. They want you to go kayaking with other kayakers, talk about programming with programmers, or find out how to cook fantastic vegan food with other vegans. False positives sometimes occur and it's a shame. Perhaps meetup could've been more proactive before shutting the group down. I personally feel confident that meetup looked at the group and made a fair decision that it was indeed violating the terms of service. As I mentioned above, I host three meetups so perhaps I'm biased. Here are they: http://www.meetup.com/hack-and-tell/ http://www.meetup.com/hack-and-tell/ - http://www.meetup.com/DUMBO-Tech-Breakfast/ http://www.meetup.com/DUMBO-Tech-Breakfast/ - http://nyc.brubeck.io/ http://nyc.brubeck.io/ If folks would prefer to use eventbrite, obviously do so. Eventbrite has no community building tools. It is a website for tickets. Meetup, on the other hand, cares so much about building communities that their whole site is built for this purpose. You will lose that.
- city41 14y ago
  I just went to the meetup facebook page and the most recent post is: >Have been double charged for the group and now my group is shut down. I tried to contact the company 3 times and no response. What is going on? Is there customer service? and not to mention this: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4698541 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4698541 Seems like meetup's customer service is not so hot.
  - Hovertruck 14y ago
    As a former employee, I'd actually say that the customer service team is one of the best I've ever worked with and they take everything very seriously.
    - 14y ago
deleted 14y ago
[deleted]
- SeanDav 14y ago
  Not sure you actually read the article - the OP used a paid account...
- hedwall 14y ago
  Except, you're wrong. To be able to create groups you pay 80$ a year. We've had the exact same experience when we tried to start the Stockholm DevOps group.
- hazz 14y ago
  In this case, it seems the service was being paid for: "We chose to use meetup.com. The status quo was that this is the best platform for event registration and we were happy to pay money (or as a matter of fact, use Ori's alrady paid account) to open up the event's registration using meetup's platform."
- city41 14y ago
  Just to be clear, meetup offers no free level services. If you want a group of any type or size, you must pay for it.
  - apgwoz 14y ago
    That's not entirely true: http://www.meetup.com/everywhere http://www.meetup.com/everywhere, though Everywhere is not really intended to be a free replacement to the "groups" product.
eurodance 14y ago
Why is this hosted on GitHub?
- sschueller 14y ago
  Since when is Github a personal blog hosting service?
analog 14y ago
So they've organised a conference using Meetup? It doesn't seem to me like that's what Meetup is intended for "Meetup's mission is to revitalize local community and help people around the world self-organize." [1] If meetup.com don't want to be used for promoting conferences then they've got every right to shut this down. [1] http://www.meetup.com/about/ http://www.meetup.com/about/
- donretag 14y ago
  What is the difference between the conference that got shut down and this conference: http://nescala.org/ http://nescala.org/? The difference is that the latter is organized by Meetup employees. A different set of rules if you work there I guess.
ghurlman 14y ago
Not listed: the offending description, on which the whole thing seems to hinge. Meetup.com seems like an awful choice for conference registration, or any one-off kind of event. I've been running not-for-profit tech conferences for a few years, and the mix of Eventbrite for registration (especially if it's a free-to-attend event, as mine are), and Lanyrd for schedule, speaker, session listings, and social interaction have turned out to be the perfect mix for me. The only thing I'm missing out of those two is a system for accepting and voting/choosing speakers and sessions, but hey, I'm a developer, there are ways. :)
- thehodge 14y ago
  I think Lanyrd can do CfP and selecting these days?
  - ghurlman 14y ago
    You can list the calls for $x, but there's no process for selection behind it.
wildmXranat 14y ago
I've joined Meetup just recently as I moved to a new area and wanted to peruse the local tech scene. As soon as I joined, I was spammed by an invite to join pitchbox.com,- meetup.com was the only service that knew about my new consultant firm address. First sentence cordially read: "Hey friend, welcome to pitchbox... " So while I like their service, color me not impressed and please stop spamming us guys.
- tgeek 14y ago
  People can't reach out to you unless you are part of a group or via a direct "friend" relationship. Sounds like you joined a group that has someone spamming the rest of the members. Meetup themselves won't spam you like that unless you ask to be told when new groups are formed around certain topics (at least it used to be this way )
tgeek 14y ago
Fmr Meetup employee, for about 2.5 years, several years ago now. On the tech side, but the company is/was small enough that everyone got some voice about how things worked, which was fantastic.(note i say a voice, but not necessarily a vote) This post reads a lot like "I violated TOS, and got shutdown for it, and now I'm going to complain because that isn't "fair"." WAAAAA. The person who wrote this post used Meetup in the way Meetup doesn't want it's service to be used. What this person was looking for, was EventBrite, which is a fantastic site also, but geared to the idea of singular events that happen, and then go away. If the poster was trying to create a group of regularly meeting/communicating folks, to foster a true community, then Meetup would have most likely not shut them down. This is a lot different than the Vim London story, which it seems Meetup rectified after gathering better understanding ( seems like someone from community support responded to internal tooling flagging what looked like a violation and didn't understand what Vim was. Honestly, does your company's support people know what Vim is??). Meetup has a right to defend the use of their platform as they see fit, and when they do things like this its not for the one organizer who did the wrong thing, its for the X number of members who are part of groups who Meetup protects like a guard dog. Meetup's support org is top notch, and they spend day and night watching an ever growing online community. When I was there we dealt with everything from Kiddie Porn Groups, Hate groups, illegal prescription sellers, pushy marketers, SPAMmers from around the world, and people who just generally wanted to abuse the trust that the platform tried to foster. The poster here hasn't posted the contents of what his Meetup group was defined as, nor has he posted the wording of the event. Note event in the singular sense, as opposed to events, or community, which is Meetup's purpose. How about if you want to fling shit at a great company that serves a large user base with respect and honesty, you do the same before flinging out a "poor me/evil company" post without any basis for proof of your case. I would imagine a "12 year veteran" would get how this should work.
nickpinkston 14y ago
There is an export feature, which I just did as a backup for my groups: Add: 'members/?op=csv' to your group root, and you should get a CSV dump of your members (most of what's worth backing up): meetup.com/YourCoolMeetup/members/?op=csv
donretag 14y ago
You can try Google Plus events: http://www.google.com/+/learnmore/events/ http://www.google.com/+/learnmore/events/ Far more customizable, better discoverability than EventBrite, but customer service as bad as Meetup's. :)
torrenegra 14y ago
It seems that Meetup.com has a major UX issue, as it may not be easy for new users to figure that their service is meant to be used by groups that meet recurrently, and not by groups that may meet just once. Having said that, I've been using Meetup.com for over four years now and I can only say but great things about the service. I used it to create the two largest meetups in Bogota: BogoTech http://www.meetup.com/bogotech/ http://www.meetup.com/bogotech/ and BogoDev http://www.bogodev.org/ http://www.bogodev.org/
- TillE 14y ago
  I certainly see nothing on any of their pages to suggest that they ban more formal conferences. All their language is very broad and vague. The fact that "Organizer" is an official class of user who have to pay is a pretty strong indicator that it's not exclusively some loose informal thing. Even in their terms of service, there's nothing that comes close to banning conferences. The only thing remotely related is that they disallow advertising commercial services.
thomaslutz 14y ago
Event seems to be up again: http://www.meetup.com/reversim-summit/ http://www.meetup.com/reversim-summit/
natch 14y ago
Not to defend everything Meetup does, but conference registration is not really what the site is intended for. Your usage pattern unfortunately just happened to look quite a bit like that something that they may think poisons the dynamic (recurring meetups of people with shared interests, not mainly driven by an organizer's self-interest) they are trying to create with the site. I'm not saying your event was exactly pure self interest or bad in any way, it just isn't something that to them looks healthy for their site. And it doesn't fit the intent of meetup. The fact that you had a poor description is the final problem here that leaves me feeling little sympathy. Every project, conference, etc. should have a clear description provided by the creator, at least if they want it to be well received. Maybe that's a lesson learned.
ilaksh 14y ago
Not very cool to just delete the data and blow up their event like that, but I think the issues are: it would be confusing if a lot of people started using meetup.com for individual events instead of groups, and probably screw up their scaling as well as their business model.
idan 14y ago
More legible: http://gist.io/4568377 http://gist.io/4568377
analog 14y ago
The meetup is back up with it's 200 users, so doesn't seem to have been 'deleted permanently'.
sighup 14y ago
I work at Meetup. Meetup does review every new group and we discourage using the service for one off events. That said its not our policy to reject them out of hand and there should have been contact from a person on our community team prior to the decision to remove the group. In this case 'remove' most certainly doesn't mean delete. There's plenty of developers at Meetup that understand the value of not deleting data. The Meetup Group has been flipped back to approved and is accesible on site. We are sorry when this happens, still, review of new groups is important to us -- there's a lot of new Meetups proposed every day that we really don't want to host on our platform. We have technology in place to help us with automatic classification, but while improving, its imperfect and in this case our safeguard of manual review was too quick to reject the group.
netaustin 14y ago
I interviewed with them a few years back, and they asked about deletion strategies. The interviewer, one of their lead developers, agreed with my "set a deletion flag and garbage collect to an archive database" response. Maybe things have changed there since 2008.

146 points by yoavfr 14y ago

Just like everything in this world someone point out his bad experience and then his opinion become famous and everyone generalizes because it gets a lot of attention. And worst, the comment section attracts all the people that had a similar experience making it even more biased; so it gets a lot of more bad press than it deserves. So despite there could being just one false-positive-not-fixed-after-human-contact every 1 million deleted meetups, in Internet that false-positive is likely to bring a lot of undeserved negative attention.

talkingquickly 14y ago
I definitely agree that one in a million failures do tend to generate an unreasonable amount of negative press, I guess because they're easy to relate to on a personal level. In this case however I think a valid point is being highlighted. False positives do happen but it's concerning that Meetup doesn't seem to have any way of rectifying them e.g. they deleted an event rather than disabling it. Personally a big fan of Meetup but if this story is accurate and in the event of a false positive, there really is no way of rectifying it, I'd be concerned about using them to organise an event.

Maxious 14y ago

See also "Meetup.com kills Vim London without warning" http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4698541 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4698541 particularly http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4698718 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4698718 > This was a mistake on our part. We're reaching out and rectifying things now. Sorry guys. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, hello Eventbrite!

MichaelGG 14y ago
Not saying that Meetup is great, and Eventbrite might be vastly better. But a simple 2-strike rule is worthless. You need to look at the actual error rate (in this case, essentially a spam false positive) to determine if Meetup is truly a poor service. Otherwise, any smaller service will look better because they will have less complaints in absolute terms.
- adamkiss 14y ago
  > But a simple 2-strike rule is worthless. If paid service unrestorably deletes data without first getting in touch with client, it is worthless, as you should have moved away first time it happened.
  - freshhawk 14y ago
    So far both cases were for events promoting a specific product. They were in the grey area for sure (this one less so) but they were both in the same grey area. So yes, now I will definitely not use them for anything related to me trying to sell something, but I wouldn't have anyway, and continue using them for actual meetups based on common interests.
    - adamkiss 14y ago
      I am not questioning whether OP did something wrong; If he did, as a paying customer (and first offender), I would anticipate some kind of notification email, or something at least. Sure, for repeat offenders: repeat notifications, then close account, refund adequate part of payment and that's it. You should never irreversibly delete someone's data. Moreover when he's paying you.
- danshapiro 14y ago
  If Meetup's error rate was public information, your point would be sound. Since it is not, it is reasonable for the author to look at his experience only. Giving them two chances and experiencing a 100% failure rate seems like reasonable cause to abandon them.
jasonlotito 14y ago
The Vim Meetup was rightfully shutdown. It was the first meetup, and that meeting was intended to promote a product. In the end, the meeting and it's intended purpose was against the ToS. Moreso, it amounted to using Meetup as a way to spam people about said product.

djb_hackernews 14y ago

That is a pretty dramatic response to Meetup deleting a group. I've never created a group, but it seems the event WAS outside of the intended use of Meetup. It looks like poster was trying to use it to host a single event where Meetup wants you to create groups that meet and communicate regularly. To me, it looks like the poster was indeed using Meetup as a listing service. I think the telling piece of information that was left out is what the questions Meetup suggested asking yourself before creating a group. But yea, this isn't as near big a deal as the poster is making it out to be.

whichdan 14y ago
It's still surprising that the data was deleted instead of internally flagged.
- PommeDeTerre 14y ago
  How do you know that the data have actually been deleted? The excerpt from the (apparently edited) Meetup response merely says, "Once a Meetup Group has been removed from the site, it's final." That doesn't say anything at all about the state of the data. It may just be that they don't want to have to deal with appeals when groups are removed, so their policy is to make all removals final, even if the data are left untouched.
  - whichdan 14y ago
    That's a good point; on Meetup's scale, they probably deal with a large amount of similar disputes. It's still a shame that they don't make exceptions for cases like this.
  - talkingquickly 14y ago
    That makes a lot of sense, I hadn't considered that it might be a decision based on the high support costs of ever entering into negotiations rather than a technical limitation or process issue.
lnanek2 14y ago

PanMan 14y ago

Meetup is quite a bad service, but I don't know any better alternatives. I was one of the organizers of one of the larger meetups, with over 4K members. Some issues: * The tools are nowhere near adequate to handle this amount of people, and more geared towards small groups * However, there is NO way to switch: Your data is locked in with Meetup: There is no export or even access to the data of 'your' members. * You can't just cancel a group: If you stop paying (which I did with a smaller group), it's offered to all members. All it takes is 1 spammer to pay, to spam all members. Basically, we are forced to keep paying for our group for years. There is a big opportunity to build a better service here, but switching from meetup will be a pain.

SeanDav 14y ago
From the sounds of it - just change your group description to something not descriptive enough and hey, presto, one perma-deleted group.
- PanMan 14y ago
  We still have >4K members, and still have to keep paying to keep them from getting spammed.
  - ajays 14y ago
    Spam them yourself, telling them to leave the group; tell them what will happen when you stop paying; and if someone still sticks around, they can face the consequences.
polynomial 14y ago
It was abundantly clear from the time Heiferman founded meetup 10 years ago they were pursuing a gatekeeper model with a lock in strategy. When that struggled to take off they had to relax the gatekeeping a bit, but they're never really changed their spots. Another example of a widely used service where users trade off a list of hidden & future downsides for a little immediate convenience.

iuguy 14y ago

When you run your business (or in this case event) on someone else's network/app/system you're subject to the whims of the owner. You're sharecropping. FWIW 44Con[1] used Eventbrite[2] (which I'd say is better for one-off events) for the first two years. Eventbrite check-in is awesome, but it's not perfect. This year we're switching to a system we've developed internally and using Eventbrite only for check-in. It's not that Eventbrite isn't good enough, more to do with integration issues, multiple events with different needs and the fees involved to do it all in eventbrite. I'd still recommend eventbrite for someone wanting to run a one-off event though. [1] - http://44con.com http://44con.com [2] - http://www.eventbrite.com http://www.eventbrite.com

j2labs 14y ago

I run three meetups and know a bunch of the folks that work there. They are extremely fair minded people. Fairer than I am myself. Given what I know of the people, the service, and my experience hosting three meetups, this story doesn't feel right. Meetup has done a lot to bolster the tech community in NYC. I have met almost all of my tech friends in NYC via meetups. Meetup employees even come to some of my meetups. I know for a fact that they care about creating positive environments where attendees are not bombarded by commercial interests. They want you to go kayaking with other kayakers, talk about programming with programmers, or find out how to cook fantastic vegan food with other vegans. False positives sometimes occur and it's a shame. Perhaps meetup could've been more proactive before shutting the group down. I personally feel confident that meetup looked at the group and made a fair decision that it was indeed violating the terms of service. As I mentioned above, I host three meetups so perhaps I'm biased. Here are they: http://www.meetup.com/hack-and-tell/ http://www.meetup.com/hack-and-tell/ - http://www.meetup.com/DUMBO-Tech-Breakfast/ http://www.meetup.com/DUMBO-Tech-Breakfast/ - http://nyc.brubeck.io/ http://nyc.brubeck.io/ If folks would prefer to use eventbrite, obviously do so. Eventbrite has no community building tools. It is a website for tickets. Meetup, on the other hand, cares so much about building communities that their whole site is built for this purpose. You will lose that.

city41 14y ago
I just went to the meetup facebook page and the most recent post is: >Have been double charged for the group and now my group is shut down. I tried to contact the company 3 times and no response. What is going on? Is there customer service? and not to mention this: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4698541 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4698541 Seems like meetup's customer service is not so hot.
- Hovertruck 14y ago
  As a former employee, I'd actually say that the customer service team is one of the best I've ever worked with and they take everything very seriously.
  - 14y ago

deleted 14y ago

[deleted]

SeanDav 14y ago
Not sure you actually read the article - the OP used a paid account...
hedwall 14y ago
Except, you're wrong. To be able to create groups you pay 80$ a year. We've had the exact same experience when we tried to start the Stockholm DevOps group.
hazz 14y ago
In this case, it seems the service was being paid for: "We chose to use meetup.com. The status quo was that this is the best platform for event registration and we were happy to pay money (or as a matter of fact, use Ori's alrady paid account) to open up the event's registration using meetup's platform."
city41 14y ago
Just to be clear, meetup offers no free level services. If you want a group of any type or size, you must pay for it.
- apgwoz 14y ago
  That's not entirely true: http://www.meetup.com/everywhere http://www.meetup.com/everywhere, though Everywhere is not really intended to be a free replacement to the "groups" product.

eurodance 14y ago

Why is this hosted on GitHub?

sschueller 14y ago
Since when is Github a personal blog hosting service?

analog 14y ago

So they've organised a conference using Meetup? It doesn't seem to me like that's what Meetup is intended for "Meetup's mission is to revitalize local community and help people around the world self-organize." [1] If meetup.com don't want to be used for promoting conferences then they've got every right to shut this down. [1] http://www.meetup.com/about/ http://www.meetup.com/about/

donretag 14y ago
What is the difference between the conference that got shut down and this conference: http://nescala.org/ http://nescala.org/? The difference is that the latter is organized by Meetup employees. A different set of rules if you work there I guess.

ghurlman 14y ago

Not listed: the offending description, on which the whole thing seems to hinge. Meetup.com seems like an awful choice for conference registration, or any one-off kind of event. I've been running not-for-profit tech conferences for a few years, and the mix of Eventbrite for registration (especially if it's a free-to-attend event, as mine are), and Lanyrd for schedule, speaker, session listings, and social interaction have turned out to be the perfect mix for me. The only thing I'm missing out of those two is a system for accepting and voting/choosing speakers and sessions, but hey, I'm a developer, there are ways. :)

thehodge 14y ago
I think Lanyrd can do CfP and selecting these days?
- ghurlman 14y ago
  You can list the calls for $x, but there's no process for selection behind it.

wildmXranat 14y ago

I've joined Meetup just recently as I moved to a new area and wanted to peruse the local tech scene. As soon as I joined, I was spammed by an invite to join pitchbox.com,- meetup.com was the only service that knew about my new consultant firm address. First sentence cordially read: "Hey friend, welcome to pitchbox... " So while I like their service, color me not impressed and please stop spamming us guys.

tgeek 14y ago
People can't reach out to you unless you are part of a group or via a direct "friend" relationship. Sounds like you joined a group that has someone spamming the rest of the members. Meetup themselves won't spam you like that unless you ask to be told when new groups are formed around certain topics (at least it used to be this way )

tgeek 14y ago

Fmr Meetup employee, for about 2.5 years, several years ago now. On the tech side, but the company is/was small enough that everyone got some voice about how things worked, which was fantastic.(note i say a voice, but not necessarily a vote) This post reads a lot like "I violated TOS, and got shutdown for it, and now I'm going to complain because that isn't "fair"." WAAAAA. The person who wrote this post used Meetup in the way Meetup doesn't want it's service to be used. What this person was looking for, was EventBrite, which is a fantastic site also, but geared to the idea of singular events that happen, and then go away. If the poster was trying to create a group of regularly meeting/communicating folks, to foster a true community, then Meetup would have most likely not shut them down. This is a lot different than the Vim London story, which it seems Meetup rectified after gathering better understanding ( seems like someone from community support responded to internal tooling flagging what looked like a violation and didn't understand what Vim was. Honestly, does your company's support people know what Vim is??). Meetup has a right to defend the use of their platform as they see fit, and when they do things like this its not for the one organizer who did the wrong thing, its for the X number of members who are part of groups who Meetup protects like a guard dog. Meetup's support org is top notch, and they spend day and night watching an ever growing online community. When I was there we dealt with everything from Kiddie Porn Groups, Hate groups, illegal prescription sellers, pushy marketers, SPAMmers from around the world, and people who just generally wanted to abuse the trust that the platform tried to foster. The poster here hasn't posted the contents of what his Meetup group was defined as, nor has he posted the wording of the event. Note event in the singular sense, as opposed to events, or community, which is Meetup's purpose. How about if you want to fling shit at a great company that serves a large user base with respect and honesty, you do the same before flinging out a "poor me/evil company" post without any basis for proof of your case. I would imagine a "12 year veteran" would get how this should work.

nickpinkston 14y ago

There is an export feature, which I just did as a backup for my groups: Add: 'members/?op=csv' to your group root, and you should get a CSV dump of your members (most of what's worth backing up): meetup.com/YourCoolMeetup/members/?op=csv

donretag 14y ago

You can try Google Plus events: http://www.google.com/+/learnmore/events/ http://www.google.com/+/learnmore/events/ Far more customizable, better discoverability than EventBrite, but customer service as bad as Meetup's. :)

torrenegra 14y ago

It seems that Meetup.com has a major UX issue, as it may not be easy for new users to figure that their service is meant to be used by groups that meet recurrently, and not by groups that may meet just once. Having said that, I've been using Meetup.com for over four years now and I can only say but great things about the service. I used it to create the two largest meetups in Bogota: BogoTech http://www.meetup.com/bogotech/ http://www.meetup.com/bogotech/ and BogoDev http://www.bogodev.org/ http://www.bogodev.org/

TillE 14y ago
I certainly see nothing on any of their pages to suggest that they ban more formal conferences. All their language is very broad and vague. The fact that "Organizer" is an official class of user who have to pay is a pretty strong indicator that it's not exclusively some loose informal thing. Even in their terms of service, there's nothing that comes close to banning conferences. The only thing remotely related is that they disallow advertising commercial services.

thomaslutz 14y ago

Event seems to be up again: http://www.meetup.com/reversim-summit/ http://www.meetup.com/reversim-summit/

natch 14y ago

Not to defend everything Meetup does, but conference registration is not really what the site is intended for. Your usage pattern unfortunately just happened to look quite a bit like that something that they may think poisons the dynamic (recurring meetups of people with shared interests, not mainly driven by an organizer's self-interest) they are trying to create with the site. I'm not saying your event was exactly pure self interest or bad in any way, it just isn't something that to them looks healthy for their site. And it doesn't fit the intent of meetup. The fact that you had a poor description is the final problem here that leaves me feeling little sympathy. Every project, conference, etc. should have a clear description provided by the creator, at least if they want it to be well received. Maybe that's a lesson learned.

ilaksh 14y ago

Not very cool to just delete the data and blow up their event like that, but I think the issues are: it would be confusing if a lot of people started using meetup.com for individual events instead of groups, and probably screw up their scaling as well as their business model.

idan 14y ago

More legible: http://gist.io/4568377 http://gist.io/4568377

analog 14y ago

The meetup is back up with it's 200 users, so doesn't seem to have been 'deleted permanently'.

sighup 14y ago

I work at Meetup. Meetup does review every new group and we discourage using the service for one off events. That said its not our policy to reject them out of hand and there should have been contact from a person on our community team prior to the decision to remove the group. In this case 'remove' most certainly doesn't mean delete. There's plenty of developers at Meetup that understand the value of not deleting data. The Meetup Group has been flipped back to approved and is accesible on site. We are sorry when this happens, still, review of new groups is important to us -- there's a lot of new Meetups proposed every day that we really don't want to host on our platform. We have technology in place to help us with automatic classification, but while improving, its imperfect and in this case our safeguard of manual review was too quick to reject the group.

netaustin 14y ago

I interviewed with them a few years back, and they asked about deletion strategies. The interviewer, one of their lead developers, agreed with my "set a deletion flag and garbage collect to an archive database" response. Maybe things have changed there since 2008.