5 ms·
The suits against Big Food have largely been stalled at the failure stage. Big Tobacco, Big Oil, and now Big Food. These socialists are sick in the head.
by Roybatty 14y ago
The suits against Big Food have largely been stalled at the failure stage.
Big Tobacco, Big Oil, and now Big Food. These socialists are sick in the head.
- Dirlewanger 14y agoEasier to blame a non-existent entity than one's own poor habits!
- gahahaha 14y agoThe "poor fat people are just weak-willed" argument is SO despicable. Americans did not suddenly get poor habits in 1976 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obesity_in_the_United_States http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obesity_in_the_United_States The obesity problem was caused by a change in the environment (and, yes, the increasing power of the food industry is one of those causes) and only a change in the environment will fix it.
- corin_ 14y agoAs a fat person I, to an extent, disagree with you. Yes you're right about environmental changes, and that new changes could solve, or help solve, the problem. That doesn't mean that my fatness isn't related to me being weak-willed. I absolutely have the ability to lose weight and get fit, but I'm too lazy to do this. I know people who love food just as much as me, but they chose either not to eat everything that they want to, or to do extra exercise to make up for it, or both. Maybe there are people out there for whom it isn't about weak will. I know genetics play at least some part, and obviously environment as well (if you grow up with parents who only feed you fast food for example). But I'm confident that for a lot of people, weight issues are about being weak-willed.
- gahahaha 14y agoSurely you must understand that the current obesity epidemic CAN NOT be caused by people suddenly becoming more weak willed? If you had been born in Japan you would almost certainly be thin now. Why? The answer is not that Japanese people have more will power.
- corin_ 14y agoI'm not saying that we have become more weak willed - i.e. that this is the reason people are fatter than 100 years ago - just that weak will does play a very big part. Maybe if I was born a century ago I would be skinny and fit, but that doesn't change the fact that my current weight is caused by my own lack of will as well. Will power is the reason on an individual level, but not the reason behind the cultural trend.
- gahahaha 14y agoRereading my comment, I don't like my tone. Sorry about that. I think we basically agree.
- corin_ 14y agoMeh, you were maybe a little strong but didn't cause any offense. On a side note, is it not also possible for different cultures to have different levels of self-control? Within the areas of society that I know there definitely seems to be correlation between how kids are brought up and how much self-control they have, so surely on a greater scale it would indeed be possible for entire countries to have more or less than other countries? (Not talking weight related now, just thinking out-loud.)
- gahahaha 14y agoI always like to think of self control the same way as free will. A useful abstraction, but not something that really exists. It is obviously beneficial for a person to believe that he is in control of his choices, of his behavior, because that increases the chance that he will take action to improve his lot. But that it is useful does not mean that it exists. Has a child of christian parents who have never heard anything but religious music, books, stories, people had the opportunity to make a free choice? I don't think so. Has an American child who has seen thousands and thousands of ads for garbage food taken an independent choice to eat that? I don't think so. We humans have precious limited mental resources and can’t afford to spend the time considering every decision rationally; therefore, we automatically subconsciously make decisions based on salient features of the current stimulus. In normal words, we make shortcuts based on limited information. Since people are so very irrational (See Thinking fast and slow by Daniel Kahneman) the idea that we are rational can be used as an excuse by those (advertisers, politicians) who want to manipulate us. So, it is in fact a dangerous idea. I sometimes entertain the notion that it would be better to live in a totalitarian dictatorship where some benevolent dictator manages the information people are exposed to and thus makes people make better choices of their own free will. (I'm aware that such a society has some dystopian aspects as well, of course)
- jshen 14y agoReally? You think the tobacco industry was doing nothing wrong and the evil socialist came around and attacked them for some socialist agenda?
- Roybatty 14y agoWoosh right over your head. That certain political agendas prefix industries with "Big" doesn't make you think. Yeah, whatever