6 ms·
I don't get your point. We can train the model with the aim that it understands ethics. Problem solved if this works; back to the drawing board if it doesn't (n
by amelius 3d ago
I don't get your point. We can train the model with the aim that it understands ethics. Problem solved if this works; back to the drawing board if it doesn't (note that the model should generalize here, as you'd expect from a human; this is probably the hard part for an AI when it comes to ethics).
Is this about the word "understand"? We're past that discussion ...
- retrac 3d ago> Is this about the word "understand"? We're past that discussion .. We're really not. https://buttondown.com/maiht3k/archive/how-to-talk-about-ai-without-adding-to-the/ https://buttondown.com/maiht3k/archive/how-to-talk-about-ai-...
- amelius 3d agoThat's just a discussion about naming things. And good luck getting it adopted.
- aspbee555 3d agoyou are not understanding, models do not understand anything, we are not passed that yet. this is not artificial intelligence, this is intelligent autocomplete. training means creating mathematical relationships to words. using that training is looking up mathematical relationships. There is no actual thinking involved in any way. There is no such concept as ethics in mathematical relationships.
- amelius 3d agoMost people now approach AI using the idea of "if it quacks like a duck, walks like a duck, etc. then it _is_ a duck". Replace duck by intelligent, or ethical, etc. and rephrase accordingly.