> 50% of the world's population lives in nuke-capable countries. Are you saying you prefer Pakistan getting nukes over India's population doubling since 1975?

> 50% of the world's population lives in nuke-capable countries. Are you saying you prefer Pakistan getting nukes over India's population doubling since 1975? That seems silly. Also this is only because of China and India, so this has been true and fine for over half a century. > The reason Africa doesn't have nukes is their poverty, ditto for the rest of the no-nukes world Pakistan is poor, Norway is rich. How can you possibly make this argument?