6 ms·
The more apt analogy is between pre-electric and post-electric lighting (~1850 to 1920), when efficiency of light generation rapidly increased, restabilizing at
by ethbr1 3d ago
The more apt analogy is between pre-electric and post-electric lighting (~1850 to 1920), when efficiency of light generation rapidly increased, restabilizing at ~222x as much light for the same unit of human labor. [0]
Across that period, first world countries massively increased their demand for light.
Further efficiency increases only matter to individual choices if they take a use case from {economically impossible} to {economically possible}.
I'd offer that by the 1920s, most goings-on in first world urban environments were no longer price constrained in terms of their light usage.
[0] See table 1.4, p21 https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c6064/c6064.pdf https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c6064/c6064.pdf