> We could have gotten it done faster, but we were well aware of the potential for slop and thus paid an absurd amount of attention to (and tokens for) code qua

> We could have gotten it done faster, but we were well aware of the potential for slop and thus paid an absurd amount of attention to (and tokens for) code quality. For example, there is a 100% test coverage requirement in both server and client, combined with AI-driven review rules that say all tests must be non-vacuous, plus a ton of invariants enforced via deterministic checks. This is why my current view in terms of LLM productivity gains are: - debugging and triaging 5x - refactoring when you have tests in place 3x - greenfield where you have zero tests is about 1.5x