> How much of the world do you think follows "common sense security measures"? Well clearly all of them, cause so far it's only been this handful of companies

> How much of the world do you think follows "common sense security measures"? Well clearly all of them, cause so far it's only been this handful of companies running a felony-generator connected to a terminal and compute resources. It would really help in these discussions if people wouldn't randomly jump between what actually happened and is happening, and things they envision/expect to happen at some point in the future ... > these agents were not asked to do any of these things no but they were clearly fine tuned to. > at a bonkers scale I mean let's not get hyperbolic > they exploited zero day flaws which by definition means they went beyond common sense security measures that's really not true. lots of common sense security measures protect against "zero day" flaws, it's called "defense in depth", and it was very much lacking