I honestly think the article misinterpreted the Git mailing list email. The first line of the article says: "People at Git has started to work on a proposal t

I honestly think the article misinterpreted the Git mailing list email. The first line of the article says: "People at Git has started to work on a proposal to make the Rust programming language mandatory." This sounded to me like all future code would need to be Rust. But the Git mailing list email says: "Announce that Git 3.0 will make Rust a mandatory part of our build infrastructure." Also, the original Git mailing list email says: "[author is porting to Rust the...] "varint.c" subsystem, mostly because it is trivial and does not have any dependencies." So, the email on the Git list says they are testing changing a small piece of C code to Rust, and Rust build tools will be mandatory [to build] (which is not surprising if a non-optional part of the code base is Rust).