I think plagiarism machine is a stretch personally in this domain. In art or writing I could see it persuasively argued (see attempts to generate famous books o

I think plagiarism machine is a stretch personally in this domain. In art or writing I could see it persuasively argued (see attempts to generate famous books or imitate illustrators). Academics and scientists build on the work of many others and always have - their work is not possible without using other’s work. Attribution is a problem here but I don’t think a new way to reference many others’ research and combine it in novel ways is the problem or should be rejected on that basis alone.