> There is no irony because I have seen humans do the same thing. Your original comment started with the sentence: > I am currently writing a lot of code that

> There is no irony because I have seen humans do the same thing. Your original comment started with the sentence: > I am currently writing a lot of code that I am not reviewing anymore. Then you give an example of catching a bad pattern the LLMs used when you actually reviewed the code, after you mentioned you had multiple agents set up to catch each others mistakes. That is the irony. You're mentioning that LLMs engage in basic bad coding patterns that are not caught by multiple agents, hence underlining the importance of human review. > There is no irony because I have seen humans do the same thing. Yes, but you were reviewing the humans. You're not reviewing the LLMs. > I set up excellent testing the same way a CTO would set up excellent testing. Knowing LLMs can make basic coding pattern mistakes (as you mention) but still unleashing them on your tests without routine human review that makes sure that test suites have not been negatively affected after each iteration seems like the polar opposite of consistantly maintaining excellent testing throughout the software development process.