5 ms·
This is the part I find being left surprisingly hand-wavey. If you extrapolate it out, you see that it has a high likelihood of inciting physical force (read:
by tcdent 4d ago
This is the part I find being left surprisingly hand-wavey.
If you extrapolate it out, you see that it has a high likelihood of inciting physical force (read: military action) as a means of enforcement, so perhaps that's why nobody promoting ideals has been direct about it.
- deleted 4d ago[deleted]
- csomar 4d agoMilitary action against whom? the US can’t even handle Iran let alone China.
- fmnxl 4d agoAmericans live in their own plane of reality, where they play the superhero surrounded by evil villains.
- cavemandaveman 4d agoAmerica doesn't want to pay the price of handling Iran. There's a difference. Clearly the US could conquer Iran but it requires a land war with mass casualties, not just sporadic bombing. Obviously China is in an entirely different league.
- pibaker 4d ago"I can afford ferrari. I just don't want to pay the price."
- le-mark 4d ago> America doesn't want to pay the price of handling Iran. And Iran has wisely not provoked the US public by launching terrorist attacks against the “homeland”.
- spopejoy 4d ago> Clearly the US could conquer Iran Vietnam (and Ukraine) would like a word
- olelele 3d agoKorea & Afghanistan too. The consequences of the Iraq blunder are also still resonating.