6 ms·

Depends. What replaces it? Does that replacement do better at keeping false claims out, or worse? Does it do better at letting true claims through, or worse?

• Razengan 4d ago
  One thing's for certain: True and false should not depend on convincing people.
  • qlte 4d ago
    Instead of a committee of subject matter experts they should use a more rigorous and trustworthy standard, like passing the solution to ChatGPT with the prompt "did this win?"
  • AnimalMuppet 4d ago
    Real true or false - which I define as correspondence (or lack thereof) with reality - does not depend on convincing people. Reality does not change when people become convinced; ideas correspond to reality whether people are convinced or not. But perceived truth and falsehood depend on convincing people - either convincing them one by one, or else convincing some gatekeeper, whose word will convince those who accept the gatekeeper.
    • Razengan 4d ago
      So if an AI proves something but ""rEpUtAbLe"" papers refuse to publish it just on grounds of it being AI, does that make it not true? You know in the past women (and other marginalized people) weren't allowed to publish scientific papers for the majority of human history? Is this how you want your "truth" to be? If so then man, no sympathy; these institutions deserve to be broken down. Let them spaz on the floor and throw tantrums all they want.
      • YeGoblynQueenne 3d ago
        ... marginalized people ... ... spaz on the floor ...