> I thought the historical examples of photography and chess engines would be enough for people to connect the dots, but apparently not. You're just an overcon

> I thought the historical examples of photography and chess engines would be enough for people to connect the dots, but apparently not. You're just an overconfident idiot who thinks that because there is an analogy along one dimension of a absurdly complex problem you've somehow arrived at a superior truth. I repeat, this is an incredibly complex situation in which no one fully understands what's going on. The letter is simply asking for greater awareness of the implications of what AI companies are doing, they're not even saying that AI is bad!