7 ms·

My comment was meant to be sarcasm. I see that didn’t come through.

• necovek 4d ago
  It did partially, which is why I have the second part — even if we applied the same rule, it's not really apples-to-apples.
  • MBCook 4d ago
    It isn’t. But it should be. I find online advertising crooked as hell. Google charges by the impression and knowingly allows huge percentages of fake impressions. How is that anything other than fraud? It’s not because it’s online advertising. And that sucks.
    • necovek 3d ago
      I am not disagreeing it's outright fraud. I am disagreeing it's the same thing as water company not testing the water they distribute on purpose (or hiding the negative results).