6 ms·

I'm imagining a future where a bunch of bizarre laws interact oddly (as they do), and now we've got websites with unnecessary nudity pasted in the corner. "Oh,

I'm imagining a future where a bunch of bizarre laws interact oddly (as they do), and now we've got websites with unnecessary nudity pasted in the corner. "Oh, those? Those are just compliance tits. Ignore those. It's just a thing that came a few years after we finally got rid of the cookie banners. The companies wanted certain protections awarded only to 18+ sites. But you can't just declare yourself an 18+ site, so some sites post the most minimal amount of imagery that constitutes erotic nudity. That's why Google's graphic for the past few months has just been that one with the two dots in the middle of the o's."

brycewray 5d ago
Reminiscent of this scene from the 1981 teen-slasher parody, Student Bodies: > Announcer: Ladies and gentlemen, in order to achieve an "R" rating today, a motion picture must contain full frontal nudity, graphic violence, or an explicit reference to the sex act. Since this film has none of those, and since research has proven that R-rated films are by far the most popular with the moviegoing public, the producers of this motion picture have asked me to take this opportunity to say "Fuck you." > [the MPAA R-rating logo appears on the screen] https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0083133/quotes/ https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0083133/quotes/
- jerf 5d ago
  Took a bit of poking, but: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KgDQ5z7bNPs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KgDQ5z7bNPs
  - eterm 5d ago
    That sound quality did something weird to my brain, I was convinced sound was accidentally coming out my laptop speakers not my headphones. I'm not even on my laptop, and I still took my headphones off to check.
    - DANmode 5d ago
      Almost assuredly a video capture of a screen.
  - HaZeust 5d ago
    This one is a ripped recording: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JzHKwhrN1Lg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JzHKwhrN1Lg
- bena 5d ago
  Fear of a Black Hat, a rap mockumentary in the same vein as This is Spinal Tap, begins with a warning about the language in the movie that's essentially them repeating the offending words three or four times. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fmaaZtINRU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fmaaZtINRU
- ratelimitsteve 5d ago
  Joke's on you, as standards loosen now PG-13 movies get up to eleven "fuck"s to distribute throughout the film (nineteen for documentaries)
  - HWR_14 5d ago
    PG-13 didn't exist in 1981. It went straight from PG to R. So less loosening of restrictions, and more adding gradation.
    - brudgers 5d ago
      And in 1981 PG movies had tits.
      - Jimmc414 5d ago
        Airplane (1980) was PG.
      - Razengan 4d ago
        It's bizarre because tits are the first thing everybody sees
        brudgers 4d ago
        At the time, I was of an age and disposition to notice.
  - SoftTalker 5d ago
    Today's 13 year olds say that word more times than that before breakfast.
    - lo_zamoyski 5d ago
      Which is, of course, a bad thing that ought not to be encouraged and that ubiquity does, in fact, encourage and normalize.
- classichasclass 5d ago
  And one of the rare incidences of the MPAA ratings banner appearing in the middle of a film.
cineticdaffodil 5d ago
[dead]
forshaper 5d ago
I've been using certain slurs as more proof-of-human, and any nuanced thinking that skirts by certain ideologies like Chechens hugging Russian artillery in 1995.
superxpro12 5d ago
and its 1 pixel wide. I propose the term pixtit
- Waterluvian 5d ago
  Also the Dixel for the male option.
  - Razengan 4d ago
    Males have tits too
freedomben 5d ago
> Those are just compliance tits. Ha! At one point some years back, in an internal presentation somebody used an image of an old computer that if you really, really squinted and looked closely, had a topless woman in ascii art in a small area of the computer screen. It was so hard to see that most of us didn't even notice, but one eagle eye did and caused a whole shit storm around it. If the presenter would have said, "Those are just compliance tits" I think my life would have been complete :-D
- abustamam 5d ago
  Great story! I remember sharing my screen at work recently and the URL bar suggested https://thisisnotporn.com/ https://thisisnotporn.com/ because I had been playing it a bit on my phone and my browser history synced to my work. I dont know if anyone caught it but I started using a different browser after that. Because it indeed is not porn but hard to explain that!
mrandish 5d ago
Why not? We already need to include typos and misspellings to signal we're not an LLM.
- pigpop 5d ago
  What use is this when you can just prompt the LLM to insert those or use any other style of writing that looks human?
erg0s4m 5d ago
Right this is exactly what happened with the new sesame laws. The government declared sesame as an allergen and enacted heavy fines if it was undisclosed. This lead to manufacturers adding sesame because they couldn't guarantee they were sesame free.
- Zak 5d ago
  "May contain" labeling seems like the better solution to this problem. This should be allowed for allergens that are present in the manufacturing or packing facility but not intended to be ingredients in the product.
  - GloriousKoji 5d ago
    That's part of the problem. "May contain" doesn't provide legal protection and then if you make it a standard there needs to be testing for compliance which ends up as the same original problem and you just add compliance tits to your food product. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34116211 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34116211
    - Zak 5d ago
      "May contain" should provide legal protection. It may be compliance tits in some cases, but that's better than forcing the addition of a compliance ingredient.
    - Dylan16807 5d ago
      > "May contain" doesn't provide legal protection Yes, this causes problems. > and then if you make it a standard there needs to be testing for compliance Why would there need to be any additional testing? If anything I'd expect "may" foods to need less testing than an accident-prone "no" food.
  - HWR_14 5d ago
    Then there would never be a reason not to list "may contain sesame". Just like every product causes cancer in california.
ruined 5d ago
©©
abustamam 5d ago
Kinda orthogonal to this, but the other day I was looking for a friend's cheer routine on Instagram so I put her school name and cheerleader routine and I got a lot of images and videos of very young girls (like aged 6-16) in very revealing cheer outfits doing provocative dances which made me very uncomfortable for many reasons. Like first, why are you making your 6 year old do this, and second, why is Instagram floating these to the top instead of adults? I dont think I want to know the answers to either of those questions.
- pstuart 5d ago
  Add beauty pageants to that list. It's gross, and a lot of people are ok with it.
donatj 5d ago
I mean, isn't this basically what's already happening after COPPA with YouTubers having to swear or make adult jokes to prove to the bots they're not targeting children with their videos?

brycewray 5d ago

Reminiscent of this scene from the 1981 teen-slasher parody, Student Bodies: > Announcer: Ladies and gentlemen, in order to achieve an "R" rating today, a motion picture must contain full frontal nudity, graphic violence, or an explicit reference to the sex act. Since this film has none of those, and since research has proven that R-rated films are by far the most popular with the moviegoing public, the producers of this motion picture have asked me to take this opportunity to say "Fuck you." > [the MPAA R-rating logo appears on the screen] https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0083133/quotes/ https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0083133/quotes/

jerf 5d ago
Took a bit of poking, but: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KgDQ5z7bNPs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KgDQ5z7bNPs
- eterm 5d ago
  That sound quality did something weird to my brain, I was convinced sound was accidentally coming out my laptop speakers not my headphones. I'm not even on my laptop, and I still took my headphones off to check.
  - DANmode 5d ago
    Almost assuredly a video capture of a screen.
- HaZeust 5d ago
  This one is a ripped recording: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JzHKwhrN1Lg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JzHKwhrN1Lg
bena 5d ago
Fear of a Black Hat, a rap mockumentary in the same vein as This is Spinal Tap, begins with a warning about the language in the movie that's essentially them repeating the offending words three or four times. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fmaaZtINRU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fmaaZtINRU
ratelimitsteve 5d ago
Joke's on you, as standards loosen now PG-13 movies get up to eleven "fuck"s to distribute throughout the film (nineteen for documentaries)
- HWR_14 5d ago
  PG-13 didn't exist in 1981. It went straight from PG to R. So less loosening of restrictions, and more adding gradation.
  - brudgers 5d ago
    And in 1981 PG movies had tits.
    - Jimmc414 5d ago
      Airplane (1980) was PG.
    - Razengan 4d ago
      It's bizarre because tits are the first thing everybody sees
      - brudgers 4d ago
        At the time, I was of an age and disposition to notice.
- SoftTalker 5d ago
  Today's 13 year olds say that word more times than that before breakfast.
  - lo_zamoyski 5d ago
    Which is, of course, a bad thing that ought not to be encouraged and that ubiquity does, in fact, encourage and normalize.
classichasclass 5d ago
And one of the rare incidences of the MPAA ratings banner appearing in the middle of a film.

cineticdaffodil 5d ago

[dead]

forshaper 5d ago

I've been using certain slurs as more proof-of-human, and any nuanced thinking that skirts by certain ideologies like Chechens hugging Russian artillery in 1995.

superxpro12 5d ago

and its 1 pixel wide. I propose the term pixtit

Waterluvian 5d ago
Also the Dixel for the male option.
- Razengan 4d ago
  Males have tits too

freedomben 5d ago

> Those are just compliance tits. Ha! At one point some years back, in an internal presentation somebody used an image of an old computer that if you really, really squinted and looked closely, had a topless woman in ascii art in a small area of the computer screen. It was so hard to see that most of us didn't even notice, but one eagle eye did and caused a whole shit storm around it. If the presenter would have said, "Those are just compliance tits" I think my life would have been complete :-D

abustamam 5d ago
Great story! I remember sharing my screen at work recently and the URL bar suggested https://thisisnotporn.com/ https://thisisnotporn.com/ because I had been playing it a bit on my phone and my browser history synced to my work. I dont know if anyone caught it but I started using a different browser after that. Because it indeed is not porn but hard to explain that!

mrandish 5d ago

Why not? We already need to include typos and misspellings to signal we're not an LLM.

pigpop 5d ago
What use is this when you can just prompt the LLM to insert those or use any other style of writing that looks human?

erg0s4m 5d ago

Right this is exactly what happened with the new sesame laws. The government declared sesame as an allergen and enacted heavy fines if it was undisclosed. This lead to manufacturers adding sesame because they couldn't guarantee they were sesame free.

Zak 5d ago
"May contain" labeling seems like the better solution to this problem. This should be allowed for allergens that are present in the manufacturing or packing facility but not intended to be ingredients in the product.
- GloriousKoji 5d ago
  That's part of the problem. "May contain" doesn't provide legal protection and then if you make it a standard there needs to be testing for compliance which ends up as the same original problem and you just add compliance tits to your food product. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34116211 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34116211
  - Zak 5d ago
    "May contain" should provide legal protection. It may be compliance tits in some cases, but that's better than forcing the addition of a compliance ingredient.
  - Dylan16807 5d ago
    > "May contain" doesn't provide legal protection Yes, this causes problems. > and then if you make it a standard there needs to be testing for compliance Why would there need to be any additional testing? If anything I'd expect "may" foods to need less testing than an accident-prone "no" food.
- HWR_14 5d ago
  Then there would never be a reason not to list "may contain sesame". Just like every product causes cancer in california.

ruined 5d ago

©©

abustamam 5d ago

Kinda orthogonal to this, but the other day I was looking for a friend's cheer routine on Instagram so I put her school name and cheerleader routine and I got a lot of images and videos of very young girls (like aged 6-16) in very revealing cheer outfits doing provocative dances which made me very uncomfortable for many reasons. Like first, why are you making your 6 year old do this, and second, why is Instagram floating these to the top instead of adults? I dont think I want to know the answers to either of those questions.

pstuart 5d ago
Add beauty pageants to that list. It's gross, and a lot of people are ok with it.

donatj 5d ago

I mean, isn't this basically what's already happening after COPPA with YouTubers having to swear or make adult jokes to prove to the bots they're not targeting children with their videos?