6 ms·
> I do think that for the atypical user that is "information-hungry," > Prior to AI, I would have just... not spent the time looking them up. You're putting y
by Planktonne 5d ago
> I do think that for the atypical user that is "information-hungry,"
> Prior to AI, I would have just... not spent the time looking them up.
You're putting yourself in the group of people who are 'information-hungry', but your own evidence suggests that's not the case.
- keiferski 5d agoI know you’re trying to be clever and critical (boy am I tired of this trope on HN) but no, I don’t agree. Being curious about a lot of things doesn’t mean you’re willing to invest 15 minutes every time you have a question. AI makes the cost of asking these questions functionally zero. Previously I’d ask maybe 1/10 of them on Reddit, get a smartass negative answer, if I get an answer at all. Now I have an assistant that answers an infinite number of questions on demand. I suspect that a lot of AI-hostility from tech/nerdy people is because they don't have the ability to display their expertise as easily as they did on Stack Overflow/Reddit/etc. A huge percentage of comments on HN are still just people trying to display their knowledge. (And I'm very guilty of that as well.)
- Planktonne 5d agoThat's a lot of leaping to conclusions based on a small criticism. I'm rather tired, personally, of the HN trope of people saying that AI is bad for/mis-used by everyone except a carefully-defined group that consists of exactly them. If you're curious now only with AI, I'd say that makes you less curious--"intellectually hungry"--than the people who were curious before, without AI. It's great that you feel you can be more curious now, but I wouldn't be so quick to declare yourself superior to others with no more evidence than that you use AI the same amount.