5 ms·
> Which of the criticisms in that article don't stand? What's changed? Which of the rebuttals in the link I gave don’t stand? > Adoption of DNSSEC has barely
by teddyh 5d ago
> Which of the criticisms in that article don't stand? What's changed?
Which of the rebuttals in the link I gave don’t stand?
> Adoption of DNSSEC has barely budged since I wrote it.
According to this graph, DNSSEC adoption seems to now be roughly 16×, i.e. 1600%, of what it was when you wrote it:
https://www.verisign.com/resources/dnssec-tools/dnssec-scoreboard/ https://www.verisign.com/resources/dnssec-tools/dnssec-score...
- tptacek 5d agoSee the comment from 'dsl upthread. As for stats: https://dnssecmenot.fly.dev/ https://dnssecmenot.fly.dev/ It is not surprising that European registrars have added millions of new names nobody is ever going to visit, all of them signed by default at their registrars. That's not meaningful.
- teddyh 3d ago> See the comment from 'dsl upthread. That comment has recieved appropriate and adequate rebuttals, so I see no need to add anything further. > As for stats: https://dnssecmenot.fly.dev/ https://dnssecmenot.fly.dev/ You said ”Adoption of DNSSEC has barely budged”, and that is what the graph which I linked shows to be hilarously false. I remember that you often used to link the same graph – until it stopped showing what you wanted, that is. Now you come peddling a different, explicitly biased, graph, which only shows what the top 1% is doing, but I really don’t care about what the top %1:ers are doing. Most people are concerned with popularity in general, not what Google and Amazon are doing. Most people are not Google and Amazon, and consequently should take no lessons from them concerning their own systems.