8 ms·
Binding arbitration shouldn't be a thing. If we want to go to arbitration is because we are in the same level of negotiation. One side imposing arbitration or a
by braiamp 7d ago
Binding arbitration shouldn't be a thing. If we want to go to arbitration is because we are in the same level of negotiation. One side imposing arbitration or any other kind of restriction on the mechanism that the individual or organization has to redress issues shouldn't be a thing
- BeetleB 7d agoThe counterargument is that if you don't have binding arbitration, you can be constantly worried that the other party will drive you bankrupt with frivolous legal proceedings, and that fear discourages collaboration. A binding arbitration puts that fear at ease.
- LocalH 7d agoBanning binding arbitration means that class actions can happen.
- BeetleB 7d agoThat's irrelevant to the point I'm making. Class action is, almost by definition, a case where there is unequal power.
- AngryData 6d agoTo me that is a flaw in the justice system that needs to be resolved by legislation and within the justice system, not something that should have some bs extralegal work around.