Other people are allowed to have their priors, too. Even under a non-informative prior, the weight of the evidence (Tristan's account, OpenAI's announcement, an

Other people are allowed to have their priors, too. Even under a non-informative prior, the weight of the evidence (Tristan's account, OpenAI's announcement, and Bubeck's "denial", if you want to call it that, plus multiple other mathematicians coming forward with similar experiences) pushes the probability mass toward some degree of impropriety. What exact evidence are you incorporating into your prior to come out with this posterior?