> you're declaring my thoughts meaningless I said irrelevant, because your argument does not contradict the point that was being made. Your first comment was a

> you're declaring my thoughts meaningless I said irrelevant, because your argument does not contradict the point that was being made. Your first comment was a list of scenarios that literally had nothing do with what you were replying to. And your "superset" comment was trying to shoot down a general observation about human behavior by pointing out that it isn't a mathematically rigorous model, as if it was ever intended or claimed to be. It is not my fault that nonsense and pedantry are irrelevant, but I'm sorry to inform you that they are. > a conversation you admit to not understanding I understand perfectly what you're saying. The source of my confusion is your insistence that it matters. It's like I told you that apples are edible and you keep insisting that they categorically aren't because some people don't like them, and also occasionally one of them might have a worm in it. > trying to push me out of the conversation My brother in Christ, all I want is for you to just stay in the conversation for once. Anyway, this is pretty firmly in "playing chess with a pigeon" territory now. Have a good one.