5 ms·

You could be presenting the most carefully-researched information in the world, but with such an obviously vibecoded site I'm not going to attempt to read it.

• polarbearballs 6d ago
  You could be presenting the most carefully-researched text in the world, but with such obviously machine made paper I'm not going to attempt to read it.
  • matja 6d ago
    You're rejecting information solely based on the aesthetic quality of the delivery medium?
    • walrus01 6d ago
      Even if the information is accurate, I'm calling it low effort slop... Smart LLMs have basically automated producing a plausible looking "content farm".
• Brendinooo 6d ago
  This is such a weird take. Did you gatekeep people who built sites with FrontPage as well?
  • TazeTSchnitzel 6d ago
    FrontPage didn't generate your content for you! So there was no reason to assume a FrontPage page might be meaningless just from how it looked. For AI-generated sites, though, if the page looks like slop, is it worth bothering to figure out if it actually is slop? It's not like they're uncorrelated variables. Sure, occasionally it won't be. But I'm drowning here. I must simply assume that if someone is serious about conveying a message, they won't package it in this form. I don't think it's even gatekeeping. You could copy-paste two tables and write two sentences into a Word document and export to HTML, one of the laziest possible ways to produce a website, and it'd still be less off-putting because it doesn't have the association with slop content.