6 ms·
The speed of light is unbelievably slow, not even as a cosmic scale, but on earth. We cannot play competitive multiplayer games globally, without 300ms ping. I
by HDBaseT 7d ago
The speed of light is unbelievably slow, not even as a cosmic scale, but on earth.
We cannot play competitive multiplayer games globally, without 300ms ping. I dream of a world playing Black Ops 2 on a original PS3 in 2026 getting into a lobby because latency is low.
- zelphirkalt 7d agoHow do you arrive at 300ms?
- fahrvrgnugen 7d agolight is 186k miles per second, the other side of the globe is 12.5k miles away - so 67 ms / 130ms+ round trip in optimum conditions. Add more for network hops and consider that fiber is not quite as fast as vacuum. 300ms feels extremely optimistic coming from my perspective of someone living on an island in SE Asia
- jmaw 6d agoSimply send your cable through the center of the earth and boom, latency reduced by ~1/2. Remember me when you make billions of $ from my idea.
- 93po 6d agoIt'd actually be about 36% shorter :)
- tiborsaas 6d agoCan't wait for the neutrino-internet to launch once they fix the packet loss issue :)
- skhr0680 7d agoFor a city that is far away from anywhere: https://wondernetwork.com/pings/Auckland https://wondernetwork.com/pings/Auckland Your real world latency is going to be worse.
- esikich 7d agoThis is a great example of information taking time: https://www.ibiblio.org/harris/500milemail.html https://www.ibiblio.org/harris/500milemail.html
- deleted 7d ago[deleted]
- rwoerz 7d agoUltimate counterevidence of an benevolent "intelligent designer"
- dinfinity 6d agoStill not as unbelievably slow as signals in our body. If you hook up a fiber connection from a button to an LED, then stub your toe on the button, the fiber can be thousands of kilometers long and you'll still (via the LED) see that you've stubbed your toe before you feel it. This is of course assuming instant activation, a direct connection and no additional latency from network hardware.
- apothegm 6d agoThe LED will display it first, but will the signal reach your visual centers first? And how about the time for your brain to process that signal and make you consciously aware of the visual vs. the way the pain signal is forwarded to conscious processes?
- dinfinity 6d agoFair issues, but none of them impact the fundamental point. I'm not trying to make a point on touch vs. visual sensing or with regard to consciousness (time shifting of visual input is a thing, which could be impactful here, see "chronostasis"). The point is to quickly and accessibly convey an intuitive understanding of the propagation speed of information in biological circuits vs. the max speed of information in our universe (to our current knowledge at least) and in our technology.